Let's talk about "calories in calories out" and why it is not that simple
Credit I have read the sentence "calories in calories out" many times online. Usually what is meant by this is that weight loss can be reduced down to how much you eat minus how much you burn in basic metabolic rate (BMR) plus exercise plus non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT or non-exercise movement). To translate it into simple terms, people often mean to convey with this that weight loss is simple. Oftentimes, I see this phrase under posts trying to fat-shame someone, for example someone who struggles losing weight or an anorexic person who is also overweight. This is usually accompanied with other 'helpful' phrases like "you can't break the laws of thermodynamics", implying that the author of a text is being dishonest about the calories they consume. Yet, I also see an equal amount of posts from people complaining about that they "gain and lose the same 5 pounds over and over again". How is this possible? Is everyone just being disho...